Rogerdodge wrote:Paul
I think you fix the focus, and move the camera.
I am also not having geat success so far.
Cheers
?? Moving the camera will also change the size of the subject between frames won't it? Or am I being think again.
Bill
Rogerdodge wrote:Paul
I think you fix the focus, and move the camera.
I am also not having geat success so far.
Cheers
It ought to maintain the relative sizes of "in focus" parts??? Moving the camera will also change the size of the subject between frames won't it?
Excellent - thanks for that, Roger!Roger Gibbons wrote:I have just noticed Guy’s comment on the argus tibia spine. I had been puzzled by the spine question until recently, given that there are two or possibly three spines that looked like obvious candidates but were in fact red herrings. Now I know where the “real” spine is i.e. the one that differentiates argus from idas, I have tried this year to get a clear photograph of it. But the problem is that, in nature, the argus foreleg is always straight (at least in my experience) and the spine is virtually invisible, laying parallel to the leg. The only way to get a decent photo appears to be to capture an individual and bend the leg joint, and I am certainly not prepared to do that.
I received an email from Olli Vesikko with this photo of the spine shown here
http://hyonteiset.net/foorumi/viewtopic ... &hilit=oka
This is the only photo of the tibia spine I have seen.