Species Popularity in Photos
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:15 pm
It's often said that data recording of butterflies can tell more about the distribution of recorders than of butterflies! Out of idle curiosity (it was raining this afternoon, here), I had a look at my own photo archive, to see which species have received most attention from my camera. I catalogue my digital photos using Expression Media (now Media Pro) software, so it was easy to print the list of images in each species category. These are the photos that I have kept, since moving to digital in 2005.
These numbers reflect many things but certainly not the abundance of the species! (poor Grayling!) Some species that involved special trips to find them get disproportionate coverage, while others that are rather difficult to photograph well are very under-represented. I always find Peacocks photograph well, and this is reflected in my results.
I wonder if other members find their photos show their own preferences (or prejudices)![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
NB I have no digital photos of High Brown Fritillaries so hope to rectify that shortly!
These numbers reflect many things but certainly not the abundance of the species! (poor Grayling!) Some species that involved special trips to find them get disproportionate coverage, while others that are rather difficult to photograph well are very under-represented. I always find Peacocks photograph well, and this is reflected in my results.
I wonder if other members find their photos show their own preferences (or prejudices)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
NB I have no digital photos of High Brown Fritillaries so hope to rectify that shortly!