Page 1 of 1
Aberration or just worn?
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 10:35 am
by andy brown
Hi,
Before I delete as a worn individual I was just wondering if it could be an unclassified aberration as it similar to Pete's in the species unclassified album.
![Dingy Skipper.jpg (886.49 KiB) Viewed 189 times Aberration or worn Dingy](./files/thumb_9912_70c7025644d6ac4c9a922e34a7ec8b6c)
- Aberration or worn Dingy
Cheers
Andy
Re: Aberration or just worn?
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 2:23 pm
by CJB
It might be worn, as here is one I took yesterday; interesting to know from the cognoscenti.
![IMG_2655.jpg (1.17 MiB) Viewed 169 times Pale Dingy](./files/thumb_11940_f11200bbe58764f2abb4192fe7308474)
- Pale Dingy
Flutter on!
CJB
Re: Aberration or just worn?
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 4:48 pm
by David M
Must admit, when I was in the Pyrenees in 2012, I saw several like this and at first had to do a double take as I wasn't sure what they were. I'm pretty confident they're very faded specimens rather than aberrations.
Re: Aberration or just worn?
Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 2:10 pm
by Lee Hurrell
I saw one in the Alps a few years back that was bald! Barely a scale left in place. Very odd...
Lee