alveus vs. armoricanus

Discussion forum for any overseas items (given that this is a "UK" butterflies forum!).
Post Reply
User avatar
traplican
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Traplice, SE of the Czech Rep.

alveus vs. armoricanus

Post by traplican »

On August 25, 2009 I have snapped a grizzled skipper and I have identified one as Large Grizzled Skipper (Pyrgus alveus). But it may be also Oberthürs (P. armoricanus). Can solve on the pictures bellow if my determination is correct?
Image
Image
Image
Image
Jan Jurníček
User avatar
Paul
Posts: 811
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: alveus vs. armoricanus

Post by Paul »

Doesn't the strongly marked hindwing upperside rule out alveus? - making armoricanus more likely ( or malvae)??.... Where taken??? :D PS... I;m guessing :roll:
User avatar
traplican
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Traplice, SE of the Czech Rep.

Re: alveus vs. armoricanus

Post by traplican »

Taken in SE Moravia (Czech Republic) , exactly here. Malvae is ruled out because the array of the boundary white spots on the frontwing is missing.
Jan Jurníček
User avatar
Padfield
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 8182
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:19 pm
Location: Leysin, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: alveus vs. armoricanus

Post by Padfield »

Just when I thought I was getting a grip on Pyrgus!!

This individual is quite unlike any alveus I have seen in Switzerland, France or Spain. The very strong central spot on the hindwing is not characteristic of western forms of the species. On the other hand, the weakly marked forewing doesn't look like the French or Spanish armoricanus I've seen either, and what can be seen of the underside doesn't look convincing! Nevertheless, of the two I would definitely plump for armoricanus over alveus.

It is probably impossible to be definitive from a photo. P. armoricanus is rare in Switzerland but last year Matt and I were convinced we had found an individual. This is it:

Image

The best underside shot I could get was this:

Image

We examined it in the hand and were both satisfied on all counts. The Swiss recorder rejected the record on the grounds that it could have been alveus. The dates suggested alveus rather than armoricanus, though in recent years flight seasons have been a bit screwed up and that was certainly not the decisive factor. The long and the short of it was that for some species, for example, armoricanus, proof is needed, in the form of a dead butterfly. Neither Matt nor I do that sort of proof, so our butterfly will remain a 'might-have-been'.

For the record, it is not necessarily the case that malvae has a submarginal line of white spots on the forewing. This ssp. malvoides (identification not in doubt) clearly lacks the spots, just like your insect:

Image

This is a Swiss ssp. malvae (I think - the distribution of malvae/malvoides in Switzerland is unclear), similarly without those spots:

Image

I don't think your insect is malvae though - it would really be very anomalous if it were!!

Guy
Guy's Butterflies: https://www.guypadfield.com
The Butterflies of Villars-Gryon : https://www.guypadfield.com/villarsgryonbook.html
User avatar
traplican
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Traplice, SE of the Czech Rep.

Re: alveus vs. armoricanus

Post by traplican »

Thans, Guy. Alveus is alleged on http://www.lepidoptera.cz as endangered while armoricanus as critically endangered. I only anticipate according this evidence that it is more probable to encounter alveus than armoricanus near me.
Jan Jurníček
Post Reply

Return to “Overseas”