Page 1 of 2
More Moths for ID
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:51 pm
by Dave McCormick
I was moth trapping last night, and even though it was cold, I was suprised by what I got. I managed to ID 3 species I caught, but need help with these:
- Moth 1
Based on looks, I think this may be a type of wainscot, not 100% on that though:
- A type of Wainscot?
- Moth 3
Is this the Satellite? Might be wrong
- Moth 5
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:49 pm
by JKT
#1:
Chloroclysta citrata/truncata
#2: I'd quess on either
Archanara sparganii/algae, but I could be wrong. Both are within your quess, though.
#3: This looks easy, but I don't have a clue...
#4:
Xestia xanthographa most likely
#5: Another mystery for me
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:01 pm
by Dave McCormick
Hi JKT,
I think your right on first one, I did find another one, with yellowish marks and I know that species is variable. I think 4 is right,
thatnks for some of the IDs
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:56 pm
by ChrisC
3 and 5 could both be Lunar Underwing
Chris
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:58 am
by JKT
So it was the same mystery.
No wonder it didn't ring a bell.
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:34 pm
by Dave McCormick
I checked, it is Lunar Underwing, thanks
did not think of it as an underwing at all.
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:09 pm
by Dave McCormick
I have one more moth I need an ID on, caught it in heath trap last night, so can anyone tell me what it is? I had a shot from front of it, but its bad as it was very windy here this morning.
- Unidentified Moth
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:27 pm
by Zonda
Got one for Dave or Denise here. It's probably a common moth, daylight flying, nectaring with butterflies, and most probably quite common. They have led me a dance or two in grassy areas. Very quick,, lucky to get a shot without flash. What is this plain looking little moth?
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:31 pm
by JKT
I'd say Dave's is another Xestia xanthographa and Zonda's Autographa gamma.
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:38 pm
by Zonda
Gosh,, that's very decisive thankyou, JKT
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:44 pm
by JKT
Okay, I admit the gamma required some probability calculations
, but the shape, overall color, behavior and dark stripe at the edge of the rearwing all fit perfectly for a very common migrant.
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:50 pm
by Zonda
JTK said
Okay, I admit the gamma required some probability calculations
, but the shape, overall color, behavior and dark stripe at the edge of the rearwing all fit perfectly for a very common migrant.
I am on the south coast, so your expertise is probably well founded.
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:35 pm
by Dave McCormick
Thanks JKT, nearly sure you are right. The wings did look a little long for square-spot rustic. Do they fold one wing over the other a bit tightly at rest? this one did
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:15 pm
by Denise
Only just found this thread.
I would say (and i've been practising!)
Dave's, 1. Dark/Common Marbled Carpet, 2, I agree with you, 3 and 5 Lunar Underwing, 4, SSR.
Sorry, I don't know the Latin names.
Zonda, I would say yours is Silver Y. Loads of them about this year. Here's one from my garden, taking a break.
I had a Hummingbird Hawk-moth today and I was gutted as I took photo's on the wrong setting. This is what I ended up with.
Denise
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:34 pm
by JKT
Denise wrote:Sorry, I don't know the Latin names.
You can try
http://ukmoths.org.uk/. I use the search on that site to decipher the common names.
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:45 pm
by Denise
Cheers JKT
Oh, I see we agree. (note to self, remember UK moths)
Denise
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:19 pm
by Dave McCormick
Hi all, yeah it was a Square-Spot Rustic and sorry Denise you had the wrong setting on, that would have been a nice pic of a hummingbird hawk-moth. I have done that plenty of times, accidently on M (Manual) mode rather than A-DEP (Auto Depth) which I usually use for quick shooting and because the manual mode is beside the A-DEP, I sometimes don't turn the dial far enough as I don't usually look at it when I go to shoot, more at the subject.
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:28 pm
by Gruditch
Denise wrote:I had a Hummingbird Hawk-moth today and I was gutted as I took photo's on the wrong setting. This is what I ended up with.
Oh Denise, bet you kick yourself. I saw only my second Hummingbird Hawk-moth of the year, a couple of days ago, no camera.
Regards Gruditch
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:25 pm
by Denise
Gruditch wrote:Denise wrote:I had a Hummingbird Hawk-moth today and I was gutted as I took photo's on the wrong setting. This is what I ended up with.
Oh Denise, bet you kick yourself. I saw only my second Hummingbird Hawk-moth of the year, a couple of days ago, no camera.
Regards Gruditch
Oh yes. I had time to get two shots off and it was gone. Switched to Tv and put the ISO up to 400 but forgot to lower the speed. I had it on 1/4000 instead of 1/200 so the pics came out nearly black.
This is what I managed to salvage. I keep trying with photoshop. No doubt, a lot of you could have done better. It's ok for what it is, and it does look like it's been printed on canvas.
Denise
Re: More Moths for ID
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:08 am
by Gruditch
A couple of years ago we had but one single day of snow. I must of took 300 images at various locations that day, only to get home and find the camera was on M. I had only checked the viewing screen once the whole morning, and out of the 300 images I took, the only one I checked, was the only one that came out, I could of cried.
Regards Gruditch