Page 1 of 2

December 2008 votes

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:51 pm
by Gruditch
This thread is here to allow you to cast your votes for the December 08 competition. See entries at gallery's, photo competition, December 2008. Voting closes on the 20TH.

You need to be registered and logged into the forums, where you'll be able to cast your votes for your three favourites. Once you've voted, that's it!

Please note : Any self votes will be removed !.

Gruditch

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:30 pm
by Susie
Gosh, it is tough this month, so many exceptional entries!

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:45 am
by Gruditch
Well done Fishiee on a clear, and well deserved victory. I'm very happy with my second place, behind such a class image, I knew the game was up, the minute I saw fishiee's entry. :(

Congratulations to Eccles for taking third, just ahead of JohnB.

Gruditch

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:08 am
by Denise
Congratulations to Fishiee, a stunning shot, Gruditch, Eccles and only one vote behind Johnb.
I actually joined the majority this time and my votes went here.

Thanks to the one kind soul who voted for me. :)

Denise

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:42 am
by Padfield
Yes, a marvellous capture, Fishiee. And the other high-scoring entries were stunning too.

Guy

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:30 am
by Charles Nicol
well done to all the winners...congratulations to johnb for his beautiful skipper close up.

charles

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:57 am
by Neil Hulme
Congratulations all round. FISHiEE and Gruditch got my votes, but I finally went for Pete's Swallowtail wing detail as a narrow third ahead of Eccles. Some other great shots in there as well. This month's comp has thrown up some really quirky stuff and might be a little more tricky to judge!
Neil

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:02 pm
by NickB
Top 4 spot-on - JohnB & Eccles tied for 3rd. Great shots all! Difficult to top FISHiEE tho!
Love the detail and sharpness in the water-droplets...

N

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:53 pm
by twitcher
Congrats to all!!

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:56 pm
by johnb
Congratuations to all the winners they were outstanding especially the first placed.I would like to thank those who voted for my entry as it means agreat deal to me as a novice.I bought my first DSLR in 08 and am trying to learn and take in all the critiques .
Johnb

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:20 pm
by Shirley Roulston
Also I'd like to add my congrat's to all the winners, its certainly pays to get up early for a photo with dew drops.
Shirley

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:47 pm
by FISHiEE
Many thanks for all the votes again. As Shirley said, worth the early start - about 5am rise and then an hours drive to beat sunrise. According to the EXIF I took this one at 6:12am :)

Hope I can find time to do a critique on the other entries this weekend... forecast is a bit rubbish so I should be stuck indoors... again!

My votes went for Gruditch, Eccles and Marklous.

I have to say it was difficult to pick my voting this time round as there were lots of nearly great shots but the cropping let them down. Concentrating more on cropping tight but at the same time cropping off an important part of the shot IMO.

Think I'll be down the bottom of the pile for the next one. Not my thing at all and there a few really impressive images there!

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:09 pm
by eccles
Congrats from me also to the winners, and especially Fishiee. My votes went for Fishiee and John B, and I liked Pete's swallowtail wing detail so he got my third vote. I would have voted for Gruditch's orange tip had the sharpening tool been used a little less enthusiastically but despite that it's still a very nice shot.

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:34 pm
by Gwenhwyfar
Congrats to the winners, that was an awesome entry Fishiee, you got my one and only vote, as I couldn’t choose between the others!

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:52 pm
by Susie
Likewise, congratulations to the winners and everyone who entered. i thought the standard was particularly high this month and you all did very well.

Fishee got my vote too and was my favourite, someone else got a vote too but the other one I voted for and really liked because it was a bit different was Padfield. A really interesting shot with a story. :D

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:17 pm
by FISHiEE
My very delayed critique! I should waffle on much less I think!

Shirley Roulston – Of the wing closeups this one was my favourite. Not really much of a challenge just to crop a bit of a wing like this, but the resulting image is very eye catching, very colourful, and I do like it a lot…. except for the fact you’ve cropped off the right hand edge of the wing which is a major major no-no and really ruins the shot. Noise is a bit of a problem due to the heavy cropping if a compact camera image I suspect. Not much can be done about that unfortunately other than to be much closer so you don’t have to crop so heavily. I expect this will receive some comments ;)

Gwenhwyfar – Like this head on angle a lot, very different. It just needs to be cropped much tighter. As it is it’s not much more than a regular shot with the ends of the wings chopped off. Love those droopy down antennae, though unfortunately the tips are out of focus. Much smaller aperture to get more depth of field would help. Also bring the point of focus a little further forward to the middle(in terms of length not separation) of the antennae to get them and the eyes fully sharp. It doesn’t matter so much if what’s behind the eyes is out of focus a little for this composition.

Padfield – An interesting shot, though probably more suited to a different competition. It’s not really all that close like above. Needs to be in much much tighter. Also the main interest, the spider, is for the most part out of focus.

Charles Nicol – I am envious of anyone who is in the position to be able to take a shot such as this having never seen a Purple Emperor myself. Unfortunately the image isn’t sharp (I can understand this if you’re shooting it on your own leg!) and it makes me cringe to see the tips of the antennae chopped off! I think a 90 degree clockwise rotation of this one might be more pleasing to the eye too.

JohnB – Now this is much more like it! Tight crop and bags of detail. But cropping of the edge of the antennae really is a shame. The one fully in the frame is out of focus but can’t do anything at all about that when you are this close. Noise is a bit of a problem but it looks like it should clean up not too bad in photoshop.

Birdy43 – This one I like a lot. Head on shot really works well, you’ve not cropped off any of the important bits and you have everything in focus. I think cropping tighter would improve this shot a lot to remove the distracting flower bud on the right and that white blob in the background on the left. Perhaps don’t fully crop off all of that on the left, maybe 2/3 of it and then clone out the rest to still give some space as the butterfly is looking a little that way. Maybe crop off a bit at the bottom too to keep the same format. Also I’d boost the colour contrast and saturation a little as the colours do look a bit washed out and muted.

Pete Eeles – From the thumbnail I thought ‘wow’ but unfortunately the full image isn’t sharp all over. Your eye is drawn straight to the red which for the most part is out of focus. Too close with too little depth of field for this shot I’m afraid. I am guessing a heavy crop from a shot of the whole butterfly where you probably get away with it not being all sharp. At the same time I am extremely envious as I’ve only ever seen one swallowtail and no way this close. To be in a position to take a shot like this would be a lifelong dream come true!

Geniculata – Fantastic detail all through, but oh the cropping! You’ve managed to chop off both the tip of the antennae and the tip of the wings. A truly stunning shot totally killed by the cropping I’m afraid 

Twitcher – Great colours, great detail, but cropping off the left most antennae is criminal. Unfortunately due to the angle you shot this at it’s made the leftmost antennae appear twice as long (or more!) as the other. I think you could have been really sneaky here and cloned in the antennae much closer to the head to make it appear in the same proportion. It would have really improved the shot having it in and nobody would ever have known ;)

Eccles – This one works really well. It’s really close, and having the antennae missing isn’t a problem for this shot. I don’t think it needs them. The diagonal lines of the antennae and proboscis work really well and the detail is superb. My only criticism is I can see that flash has been used and it’s a bit harsh and has killed the colours a little. I would take the flash power down by about 2/3-1 stop I think. Perhaps tone down that bright highlight in the bottom right too, though reduced flash would reduce that anyway. Got my 2nd place vote.

Denise – really like the composition of the butterfly in the frame, and like Eccles’ shot above the lack of antennae ends doesn’t really matter for this one. My two main concerns are the subject isn’t really all that sharp anywhere and the white sky in the background isn’t very exciting. A bit of fill flash would normally help to put some more light, colour and detail into the shadows doe to the bright sky behind but that white flower in the foreground will really blow out badly. If I were taking this shot I would try and alter my shooting position in such a way to get some of that green I can just see in the background to fill all or most of the background. It may only require a very tiny shift in shooting position but it would make a big difference.

Sussex Kipper – I do like this shot, but I think for a wing shot under a heading of ‘close up’ it needs to be much closer and to concentrate on just a small section of the wing rather than almost the whole wing pair in this case. I think either flash or very harsh sunlight has blown some of the highlights in this shot a little too. Funnily enough I took some similar shots last summer and flash did the same for me. The majority of the wing is dark so the camera exposes for this. Need to remember to either dial the flash down a bit or dial the exposure compensation down.

Dave McCormick – Well yes it is close, but it’s about the most un-interesting part of the butterfly you could find! Good for one of those competitions where you have to identify the object from the extreme macro image – is it a Ringlet?! The noise produced by this small sensor compact camera really does make a mess of the detail and the purple bit on the left is quite distracting and should be cropped off.

Markulous – Nothing much to say about this one really. Colours great, detail great, composition great! Just the tops of the antennae are a little soft. Perhaps I’d compose from a fraction lower to be looking up a little more at the subject another time. Got my 3rd place vote.

M_Galathea – Upright letterbox format is quite different and nearly works. Just make it a bit wider next time to keep in that other antennae – criminal cropping!! I might crop a little off the top too…

Gruditch – Love it! Maybe one or all of a touch over sharpened, touch over saturated, touch over contrasted(I dunno. Contrastified didn’t work!) but the composition is great, it’s up close and personal as the theme asks and it’s got bags of detail (shame about the ‘shoulder’ though). Got my vote for 1st!

Deano – Nice idea with the composition. I have tried similar shots myself. However I would ideally like the shot taken from a slightly lower or higher position to separate the antennae from the far wing as they are a little lost. Also it looks like flash or harsh sunlight has muted the colours a little so needs a bit more contrast and saturation as a result.

Keith Woonton – Like the composition but needs to be cropped a little tighter I feel. You’ve got both the antennae in however! Lacks a little sharpness and detail unfortunately and those two grass stems in the middle of the image and the bit of one bottom right are a distraction.

NickB – Another Purple Emperor on trousers shot? I REALLY love the angle this shot is taken at, and that curled up yellow proboscis and the eyes really make this shot, but you’ve done what many others and have cropped off a critical part – the right hand antennae! The left hand one is also very out of focus. I’d also recommend a bit of fill in flash to get rid of some of the near side shade. So nearly a great shot!

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:28 am
by Shirley Roulston
Thanks for the compliments, I'm glad you liked it. I struggled for weeks to get a photo for the comp. So, this photo was done at the last hour so to speak. It was not a comp for a 'compact' but I got two votes and I was pleased with that. :D
Congrat's to the winners.

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:00 am
by NickB
FISHiEE said: "NickB – Another Purple Emperor on trousers shot? "

They're very friendly at Fermyn! Smelly jeans (no offense Charlie!) seem to be a favourate....
(tho' I'm sure the shrimp paste may also have something to do with it as well!)

Worth a trip in July... as is Norfolk for Swallowtail in May! (Why bother with all these exotic trips, FISHiEE, when you have so much still to see at home?)
NickB

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:54 am
by FISHiEE
I am hoping to go looking for both seriously this summer. Unfortunately it might be difficult getting to Norfolk for the right time of year this year with other commitments. Actually I wasn't sure until recently there was much chance of actually seeing one if I did visit Norfolk... Any tips for them would be handy :)

Re: December 2008 votes

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:57 pm
by Hamearis
[quote]Any tips for them would be handy [/quote]
fishee
Strumpshaws good, wet meadows best.
But the cottage at NR339070 gets em in the garden, and they dont mind you going in after them.
Ham