Page 1 of 1
Canon 450D
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:19 pm
by Pete Eeles
Re: Canon 450D
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:35 pm
by Gruditch
Just a bit confused, I was checking out Canons new entry DSLR, the 1000D yesterday. It was then advertised as "new entry model" with a rec retail of £499.00, only a pound less than the 400D.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Now today, it has a rec retail of £649.00, which would make it £49 more than the new 450D, but comparing the models I can't see how its higher in the range than the 450D.
http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product ... /index.asp
Gruditch
Re: Canon 450D
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:47 pm
by Dave McCormick
I can't see how any better the 1000D is than the 450D either, I'd go for the 450D over that, cause that 1000D just looks like a slightly better 400D.
Re: Canon 450D
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:03 am
by eccles
Re: Canon 450D
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:34 am
by Gruditch
And some people say they can't afford a DLSR
Gruditch
Re: Canon 450D
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:40 am
by Sooty
Gruditch wrote:And some people say they can't afford a DLSR
Gruditch
The camera isn't so bad. But the bloody lenses..........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Canon 450D
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:58 am
by Hamearis
Say Good Night Sooty!
Re: Canon 450D
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:37 pm
by eccles
The Sony 18-70 kit lens is quite good when stopped down a bit, and I've had good results from mine when using it outdoors as a general walkaround lens. It's a bit soft at the edges and c/a can be a problem at the wide angle end of the zoom range, but I'd say it's better than the earlier Canon 18-55 non-IS version.
New Sony 'G' lenses are overpriced when compared to Canikon but the series 1 Minolta AF lenses are good quality and can be bought for decent prices on the second hand market.