Page 35 of 43

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:38 pm
by Jack Harrison
Goldie: 18-55mm lens because I can take shots really close up but on the 70-300mm lens it's very changeable , I can take shots from a distance and bring the BF up really close with out disturbing the BF, this seems to be where I've got confused into what to use.
I can't really help a lot here as I don't use a SLR with interchangeable lenses. Mike Oxon does and he will know more about minimum focussing distance, etc. with SLR lenses.

My own observations here in north Scotland: Ringlet is becoming quite a regular in my wild garden. Ringlets happily fly in cloudy weather so long as temperature is above around 14C: clearly well adapted to northern climates.

Jack

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 8:43 pm
by MikeOxon
My suggestion to Goldie, and anyone else trying to understand what different lenses can do, is to practice on something easier than butterflies! Flowers in the garden are a good subject and, with these, you can try different lenses at different distances and try various settings, until you find what works best for you.

One of the things that I found difficult to get used to, when using a Lumix FZ200, was that the closest focus distance varied with the zoom setting. Most (not all) SLR lenses have the same closest focus whatever the focal length setting so that's one thing less to think about.

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:12 pm
by Goldie M
Thanks for your help Guys, I tried out different settings today just to see what differences there was in the different shots, I'll keep doing this till I hit on what I think is best for me, it was just great to get out and enjoy the Sun for once, thanks again, Goldie :D

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 5:31 pm
by Jack Harrison
16th September 2016

We in north Scotland have escaped the searing heat of the south. Indeed, it has been a very pleasant summer.

Today in the garden several Peacock (they have had a good season - and bear in mind that distribution maps show that 40 years ago Peacock did not even occur in this area), one Tortoiseshell (most no doubt are already hibernating) and this superb Painted Lady.

Image

Image

Image

Jack

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 9:12 pm
by trevor
Stunning Painted Lady, Jack. Fine camera work.

Trevor.

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 9:14 pm
by Katrina
Gorgeous photos!

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 10:30 pm
by bugboy
A very accommodating Lady you have there!

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:34 am
by MikeOxon
She flew a long way for her portrait but she was worth it - very nice pics :)

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2016 9:41 am
by Jack Harrison
She flew a long way for her portrait
I saw a couple of tatty Painted Ladies in May after a spell of easterly winds. These might have originated in the Baltic region - don't know - but the few fresh ones I have seen in the past few weeks are undoubtedly the offspring of May immigrants.

When I began butterflying circa 1945, Mum would name locations where we would go for butterfly walks : Charlie's Lane, Humph's Hut. One was "Painted Lady lane" where we saw the butterflies by some cottages(**). Sadly today, "Painted Lady lane" has vanished under an industrial complex (Great Yarmouth).

(**) Gapton Hall cottages where a family of about 12 to 14 lived - bred like rabbits.
I remember as an eight-year old being very confused as one of the children had an aunt younger than herself. Work out that one!

Jack

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:46 pm
by Jack Harrison
17th September
More Painted Ladies today in Cawdor Castle gardens mixing with more numerous Peacocks and one Speckled Wood. I still hold out hopes for Comma (today's weather was ideal) but nothing yet.

Also saw what I believe to the the Thain of Cawdor - well there's a guy who looks the part in kilt, etc who hangs around hangs around the castle.

On a ferry a few years ago, a group dressed in kilts were on their way to some "do" in Mull.
We all wonder what Scotsmen wear under their kilts. It was quite windy on the ferry and all was revealed: tartan underpants :wink:


Back at home, Silver Y moth joined in the fun in our garden.

Jack

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 8:04 pm
by David M
Good to see you're getting a few species this late in the season, Jack. Love the Painted Lady images. They get everywhere, don't they?

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 4:22 pm
by Jack Harrison
Do you mind if I join you?

Image

Jack

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 2:59 am
by Jack Harrison
A trawl through old family picture found this (school photo).

Me in 1947 :?
me 1947.jpg
me 1947.jpg (8.67 KiB) Viewed 2898 times
Well, it amused me. It was about that time I got my copy of "South" . (The Butterflies of the British Isles).

Jack

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 10:16 am
by MikeOxon
Good to see you've emerged from under the ice-cap at last, Jack :lol:

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 4:28 pm
by Jack Harrison
It's not that cold an area despite being 57.5 degs north where I live. Local micro climate is good for arable farming. Certainly a very sunny area and too dry at times. For example a mere 2.00 mms rain so far this month. Today reached 20C.

But I do admit, this area is not especially good for butterflies. At the moment, lots of Green-veined Whites, a scattering of Orange Tips plus a few - very few - Speckled Woods. A good birding area though. In the past week I have watched Slavonian Grebes and Black-throated Divers on their breeding lochs. A little adventurous tomorrow when i am going to visit familiar territory on the east Aberdeenshire coast; hopefully fours species of Tern, Guillemots, Razorbills and Puffins and maybe, the Ythan Estuariy's resident King Eider mixing it with the commoners.

Jack

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:24 pm
by Jack Harrison
Bird i/d help please. LBJ size of Chaffinch. Melodic three note song.
Jack

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:02 pm
by bugboy
Whitethroat :)

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:12 pm
by Padfield
That's what I thought, but what about the melodic, three-note song? Whitethroats can hardly be described as melodious. Is this a young bird?

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:53 pm
by Jack Harrison
My first thought at the time was Whitethroat. But when I checked on bird sings/calls, it was nothing like it. I have to wear hearing aids these days and one of the many drawbacks is great difficulty in determining where the sound is coming from. So maybe another hidden bird was doing the calling.

It's very difficult to remember sounds but as best I can recall, two shorter notes followed by a slightly longer one. Pitch lower than say Blackbird. Very persistent and musical.

Just had a Red Admiral in the garden watching me cut the grass. While not as hot as in the south (here 21C), I had to give up only halfway through due to the humidity (dewpoint 17C).

Jack

Re: Jack Harrison

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 3:08 pm
by bugboy
I guess it's not particularly melodic when compared to some of the other Warblers, but it's not unpleasant (also maybe Jack's version of 'melodic' has been altered from listening to too many bagpipes! :lol: :wink: )

Doesn't look like a young bird, can't see any sign of a gape.

https://www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildl ... itethroat/