Re: European Butterflies - A personal diary
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 3:54 pm
And I forgot to add , I bet I have that wrong ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
UK Butterflies Discussion Board
https://ukbutterflies.co.uk/~ukbutte1/phpBB/
https://ukbutterflies.co.uk/~ukbutte1/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=10325
I think you were right when you said you thought it was a heavily marked athalia, but you were wrong when you said you thought you had got it wrong.
Firstly , apologies Paul for hijacking your diary one last time , but , Roger , I took these at La Molina at 1600mtrs at the same time in a marshy gulley. I again rigorously checked all available information and identified them as diamina. I wonder how they compare with your photos and conclusionsRoger Gibbons wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 6:42 pmI think you were right when you said you thought it was a heavily marked athalia, but you were wrong when you said you thought you had got it wrong.![]()
It seems to demonstrate that there are some very tricky specimens out there.
One of my quests in the Pyrenees has been False Heath Fritillary diamina form vernetenis which looks very unlike nominate diamina. I had a collection of photos (I think Guy saw them, maybe) of contenders, all of them quite different. The expert view was that they were all athalia. So I still only have only one confident image from 2003 taken with an old film camera.
Roger
My apologies too!
I think those show diamina too. The underside is definitive in this case, though vernetensis does not always show those typical dark brands, making it harder in such cases.
One anecdote, in the context of identification. Normally, it’s a case of someone thinking a common butterfly is a rare species, but not always.
That's a classic Roger!Roger Gibbons wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 7:49 am
One anecdote, in the context of identification. Normally, it’s a case of someone thinking a common butterfly is a rare species, but not always.
Around 1998, on holiday in the Bordeaux region, I took a photo with my old film camera of what I thought was a good old English-type Ringlet (Aphantopus hyperantus). About five years later, looking though these old photos, I thought those rings look rather large and then I realised it was a False Ringlet (Coenonympha oedippus), one of the rarest and most localised species in France. Aaargh!
I relayed this story to friends in the butterfly world, Guy included, and they shared the amusement.
Roger