Page 2 of 2
Re: Species that need differentiating
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:23 am
by Pete Eeles
I think we've just concluded that this technique isn't fool-proof, even when we know what the answer is!
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Species that need differentiating
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:29 am
by Padfield
It
might be foolproof in the UK - but it probably fails over the whole range of the species.
In fact, pics 1, 4 and 6 were SPBF, the others being PBF.
You both agreed 3 was SPBF - so here's the full picture - clearly a PBF:
And you both agreed 6 was PBF - again, this is clearly a SPBF:
Guy
Re: Species that need differentiating
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:09 pm
by Tony Moore
Denise wrote:I would say, SPBF, PBF, SPBF, SPBF, PBF, PBF, but it is early and I've only had one coffee!
Who's right Guy?
Denise
Hi Denise,
Exactly how I would have ID'd them (and I've only had four glasses of wine
). So, perhaps, not so foolproof
. I'm very surprised by No.6.
Tony.
Re: Species that need differentiating
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:23 am
by Denise
Hi Tony,
Great minds think alike
I was also very surprised by number 6.
Still, practice makes perfect, or so I'm told.
Denise