Page 2 of 14
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 1:57 pm
by Paul
Dull day.... another GVW..
![Image](http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd306/ptkip/10PnapiNZ2020031405-Copy.jpg)
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 2:12 pm
by Jack Harrison
Paul
That’s an excellent photo with superb resolution. But how do you post so that it appears that size? If I try to post a picture, it is reduced to circa 500 pixels wide (that’s no big deal) but more to the point, the resolution looks dreadful. Even if I upload at 500 pixels, it still looks has poor resolution even though not resized. Because of that, I added a note on my blog to the effect that to in order to see a picture with decent resolution, it is necessary to click on that image. But you seem to have overcome that difficulty. How?
Jack
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 2:19 pm
by Padfield
You upload pictures, Jack, while Paul links to images already on the net using the Img tag.
I do the same, but always at lower resolution, because I store my web images smaller (I have many thousands on the web, at my own expense!).
Since you have your own website, you could do likewise if you wished. You should limit pictures to 800 pixels across, though, as otherwise they will be cropped on many browsers.
Guy
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 2:53 pm
by Jack Harrison
...while Paul links to images already on the net using the Img tag
I know how to link to a picture on my own website but don't understand this Img tag that makes it appear on ukb.
Jack
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 4:17 pm
by Zonda
That's the best GVW shot i've seen this year. Tripod and tubes, i bet.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 5:36 pm
by Padfield
I've sent you instructions for embedding pictures via PM, Jack.
GUy
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 5:43 pm
by Paul
Hi all,
Jack, I use photobucket to host my photos, uploading them there with one dimension at 800px, then copying & pasting the available img code, as Guy says. no tubes, bellows or tripods, just a trusty FZ50 and a steady hand!! - must do it properly one day
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 6:40 pm
by Jack Harrison
Thanks Guy and Paul. Here's my test:
viewtopic.php?f=29&t=4056&p=32302#p32302
Jack
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 9:00 pm
by Paul
Looking very good Jack
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Re: Paul
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 6:04 am
by Jack Harrison
Thanks Paul and Guy. I have now registered with Photobucket and am much happier with the way pictures appear on ukb. You can see my Photobucket uploads in my diary.
I had discussed with Pete in the past the fact that direct uploads to ukb never seems to do justice to the pictures. Pete is aware of this but is apparently something to do with the resizing algorithm over which he has little control.
Incidentally Paul, you’d love the Lumix FZ38 successor to the FZ50. Much lighter weight and 12 mp (for constructive cropping, etc). Neil Hulme and I – to name but two – are FZ38 enthusiasts. Costs about £240.
Jack
Re: Paul
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 6:28 am
by Pete Eeles
Jack Harrison wrote:I had discussed with Pete in the past the fact that direct uploads to ukb never seems to do justice to the pictures. Pete is aware of this but is apparently something to do with the resizing algorithm over which he has little control.
The trick is to resize your images to 800 x 800 before uploading, rather than letting the UKB mechanism do it for you
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Paul
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 6:55 am
by Jack Harrison
OK, here goes (I take it Pete that you mean 800 wide or 800 high rather than a square picture). The ones on Photobucket were in fact 800s so I’ll repeat here using ukb direct upload rather than Photobucket.
Now, that 800 x 600 has been resized to something like 500 x 375 but has lost its bite and looks far less clear until I click on the image and see it full size
That is why perhaps many good pictures taken by others are dismissed as being – well, “iffy”. It’s a bit of a fag to click on every photo to see just how good it really is.
Jack
Re: Paul
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 7:10 am
by Pete Eeles
Hi Jack - I've replied here:
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4111&p=32317#p32317
to get this discussion out of Paul's personal diary!
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Paul
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 8:02 pm
by Paul
Re: Paul
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 8:13 pm
by Jack Harrison
Superb pictures Paul – and taken with a much derided Box Brownie. Morecambe Bay area I presume?
You just can’t beat decent image quality of a larger photo. After today’s discussions, I will be uploading my pictures from a third party such as PhotoBucket. It is perfectly easy to compress 800 pixel images to around 100 kb with no noticeable loss of quality, so even those unfortunates with miserable internet speeds shouldn’t suffer too much.
Jack
Re: Paul
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 8:26 pm
by Paul
actually a much more sensitive site in Yorkshire.... tiny and fragile, so very secret!! and thereby hangs another can of moral worms!!!
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Yep, Box Brownie hanging on in there well presently
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
.... must have a look at the other FZ you mentioned, but I really want to join the Canonista
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Re: Paul
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 8:37 pm
by Jack Harrison
Paul wrote:
actually a much more sensitive site in Yorkshire.... tiny and fragile, so very secret!!
Ah you must mean that place near.........
Jack
Re: Paul
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 8:51 pm
by Paul
Near to that place called oblivion
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Re: Paul
Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:58 pm
by Paul
Saw a Comma in the garden today, otherwise just OTs & GVWs..... this visitor dropped in overnight ( National Moth Night)...
![Image](http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd306/ptkip/P1160605001-Copy.jpg)
Re: Paul
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 7:54 pm
by Paul