![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
I always ask before mention anything that I think may be sensitive, and if asked not to state the location, I have no problem with that, and I fail to see why any one else has.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Gruditch
I can't speak for Jack, but (since I was the only other respondent), that pretty much completely misses the point of what I was saying.I always ask before mention anything that I think may be sensitive, and if asked not to state the location, I have no problem with that, and I fail to see why any one else has.
Just so that we're clear - what is that exactly? That nobody should be mandating what can and cannot be publicised?Felix wrote:... that pretty much completely misses the point of what I was saying.
kind of sounded like you had a problem.Felix wrote:Hmmm. So can we assume that if a member of UKB reports a sighting this will be displayed on the forum and not censored? or will this fly in the face of Hants BC sightings policy (for example)?
My point being, is this an independent site for enthusiasts to share and debate views, opinions, photographs and sightings, or is it subject to a higher authority who will edit what information it deems 'appropriate' for an individual to share?
I am confident in being able to make that decision myself rather than have someone else make it for me.
Fxile.
I hope this is a mistypethe manager of large spermarkets
But how long ago was that? Thirty years ago that was not considered so dreadful but is it still happening today?Pete Eeles wrote: I have objective examples of item 1 (such as Marsh Fritillary larval webs being removed from site XXX as a result of their existence being publicised).
That was just one example. So what about a sighting that results in a site getting overrun with individuals who don't care for anything but their photos? This happens.Felix wrote:... the low key publication of a site, sighting or locality to see a species on this web site is highly unlikely to make a blind bit of difference either way.