Paintbrush Swift?

Discussion forum for getting a butterfly identified.
Post Reply
User avatar
Tony Moore
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:37 pm

Paintbrush Swift?

Post by Tony Moore »

pbs.jpg
Found this, this morning. It was a big beastie - 45/50mm wingspan - and the forewing long, sharp and narrow. Maybe too big for Paintbrush or Philippine Swift. The books suggest that these Swifts can only be confidently separated by genital dissection, but I thought it worth a post - especially considering the weather forecasts emanating from the UK presently. :mrgreen:.

Tony M.
User avatar
Chris Jackson
Posts: 1929
Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 6:35 am
Location: Marseilles, France

Re: Paintbrush Swift?

Post by Chris Jackson »

Hi Tony,
Thanks for showing us your photos. Here in Europe, its getting colder day by day.
Chris
User avatar
Padfield
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 8182
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:19 pm
Location: Leysin, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Paintbrush Swift?

Post by Padfield »

The size rather deters me from thinking it is the paintbrush swift. I know some of the Caltoris species have wingspans of about 4.5 cm (from measuring pictures in my books) but others are smaller - and I haven't got pictures of the particular Philippine species to measure. If it is big enough, Caltoris bromus looks a good bet.

Someone really does need to produce an affordable reference book to the butterflies of this part of the world! I recently acquired an excellent guide to the buterflies of the South Pacific and New Zealand, and ages ago bought comprehensive guides to Australia and India - but South-East Asia is much more expensive! :(

Keep posting!

Guy
Guy's Butterflies: https://www.guypadfield.com
The Butterflies of Villars-Gryon : https://www.guypadfield.com/villarsgryonbook.html
User avatar
Tony Moore
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:37 pm

Re: Paintbrush Swift?

Post by Tony Moore »

Thanks, Guy,

As I noted in my 'Another biggy' post, I think I was a little ambitious sizewise (ugh! horrible!), with this one. 36/38mm would have been nearer the mark. Apologies...

Tony.
Post Reply

Return to “Identification”