![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Tony M.
It looks intact to me - no nibbles out of the wingspadfield wrote:Eatern [sic] baton blue
It's this modern habit of phonetic spelling that causes problems, it's an Eton baton blue (probably on holiday during the parliamentary recess)MikeOxon wrote:It looks intact to me - no nibbles out of the wingspadfield wrote:Eatern [sic] baton blue![]()
Mike
I take it you'd rather it was chequered blue - sorry! Unfortunately, I'm confident it's not. There are lots of reasons but a sufficient one is the submarginal region of the forewing. In chequered blue there is a strong double row of spots. In Eastern baton the inner row here is strong but the outer one is vestigial, giving the impression of a single row of spots. The hindwing orange pattern is also different, being much stronger and better defined in chequered blue.Antonym wrote:Thanks, Guy - aarrrrggh!
TM
As I am sure you realise, this is the time of year when one has to find something to write about, in the absence of any butterflies!padfield wrote:I blame my upgrade to Windows 8