Melitaea ( Mellicta ) differentiation - undersides

Discussion forum for any overseas items (given that this is a "UK" butterflies forum!).
Post Reply
User avatar
Reverdin
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:22 pm
Location: Northern England

Melitaea ( Mellicta ) differentiation - undersides

Post by Reverdin »

In the past I had great difficulty with differentiating these species in Europe, and I am still far from confident. Lafranchis, Tolman, all of the books I find helpful but not the way I would like to see it... comparative views all in one place... so if anyone wants to add a species here, cropped to much the same as I have done for starters, I would be very grateful... it could become a useful resource in time, possibly... so to start off...
athalia ( Heath )
athalia ( Heath )
diamina ( False Heath - Alps)
diamina ( False Heath - Alps)
parthenoides ( Meadow )
parthenoides ( Meadow )
varia ( Grisons )
varia ( Grisons )
cinxia
cinxia
deione berisalii
deione berisalii
didyma
didyma
I'm not even sure of the parthenoides... so aurelia, britomartis and asteria etc etc are missing from this group... any offers? :D
Last edited by Reverdin on Sun Nov 27, 2011 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Padfield
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 8192
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:19 pm
Location: Leysin, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Melitaea ( Mellicta ) differentiation - undersides

Post by Padfield »

This will be an interesting page. I can add aurelia, definite parthenoides (for a page like this I think all pictures should be 100% IDs!) and vernetensis (which is rather different from nominate diamina). I'll do this when I get a moment to look for the best pictures, unless someone else provides them first.

The problem, as you know, is that the undersides are very variable. I'm looking forward to my copy of the new book Butterflies of Europe and the Mediterranean area arriving (see: https://sites.google.com/site/tshikolov ... anean-area), as it has excellent series of set specimens of all species. Ugly though set specimens are, they do provide a good standard for comparison and should all be 100% verified individuals. The specimens are drawn from collections all over Europe and were not, I believe, taken for this book.

Guy
Guy's Butterflies: https://www.guypadfield.com
The Butterflies of Villars-Gryon : https://www.guypadfield.com/villarsgryonbook.html
User avatar
Reverdin
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:22 pm
Location: Northern England

Re: Melitaea ( Mellicta ) differentiation - undersides

Post by Reverdin »

That does sound like a good book, agreed on the set specimen shudder! - with a few contributions of the variations within a species it could work well, but the images will be necessarily disjointed, unless maybe downloaded to a moderator to place on in one single post ?
There are many ID difficulties which could respond to such a posting I think, remembering how difficult it used to be when one hadn't seen much.. eg - is my photo icarus or eros... when if you have met both species there would never have been any doubt - so it wouldn't only have to be the notorious erebia or pyrgus. -
You have hit on the problem though, what if my (only) parthenoides underside was actually summit else. :roll:
Post Reply

Return to “Overseas”