The fact remains Pete that it is somewhat prejudicial to jump to the conclusion that the sight of a net equates to the presence of a butterfly collector. When I see a man with a shot gun I do not jump to the irrational conclusion that they are about to rob a post office.Pete Eeles wrote:Because it is the primary tool used by collectors in the field.Felix wrote:Why is it always this humble bit of equipment that allegedly gives people offence?
Really? That surprises me Pete. People who comment on a dog are not usually labouring under the assumption that the dog owner harbours some sort of evil or misguided intent.pete eeles wrote:I see no difference between someone, out of curiosity, inquiring about the use of a net, and someone commenting on a pet dog. The net is irrelevant.
Felix.
PS. Padfield, I've sent you a PM...