The second butterfly is not damaged but the wing is slightly open- easier to see on the raw image. Surely sharpness and the fact that three butterflies of at least two species are almost perfectly lined up on a piece of grass is worth something?Pete Eeles wrote:In my opinion, your August photo is nowhere near as good as your July photo. It's relatively-uninteresting, and the second butterfly looks as if it has a damaged wing! Sharpness didn't come into it, for me
Interestingly although the photo received no votes along with 11 other photos, on ratings there were 19 lower so I suppose there is a difference of opinion. At the end of the day whether someone likes or dislikes a photo is mainly subjective.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)