Sorry - I missed this thread. If you close down the 'new posts' page before you've looked at them all, the ones you missed don't appear again the next day!
ANYWAY, this form is frequent but not the 'norm' - perhaps about the same frequency as
caerulopunctata. This is from this year:
This is from last year, with hints of the same:
Both these are rather darker, being presumably from a higher altitude than your female.
I've never seen it on a male, though there are often purple streaks there.
The official names of aberrations can't be used for other species unless someone has officially named that aberration in the other species (there are plenty of
lanceolatas around, for example, but you cannot correctly call something
lanceolata without going through the rigmarole of being the author of the name). I think that's the case anyway. To read the official rules you have to fork out a lot of money on the ICZN, ever since they got all upset about people breaching copyright by publishing bits of it on the web! I should have downloaded it when I had the chance...
Guy