Ring any bells Jack, in this case I never noticed that spell check had changed it.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Gruditch
needs a question mark.Ring any bells Jack
I think we could all have the same sort of questions - such as why dog-pooh makes a better backdrop than a flower for butterfly photography? - and the answer is not that any of the photos are "bad", it is just that personal preferences differ and some of the others ARE better - from a personal point of view the angle of the butterfly does not show it off to the best advantage. (I have solidly supported the nil-points club myself for some time, so I know how it feels! Someone gave a vote this time tho. Thanks!!!!)Shirley Roulston wrote:... but I would like you experts to tell me what the heck is wrong my Small Copper picy in the comp, its on the front of my calendar of butterflies and all sorts of people like it so why nil points.Shirley
You do talk a load of crap at times Nick.....why dog-pooh makes a better backdrop....
.....You should not expect anything else but bull-shit from an old Taurean!jackharr wrote:You do talk a load of crap at times Nick.....why dog-pooh makes a better backdrop....
Jack
Right - don't say I didn't warn you!!!Just a thought - don't know what prompted it - but I was wondering if bald heads can be used for bounce flash? I am of course unable to test the idea myself.
I think it is a question of knowing the limitations of each and working with them! I have had to use a monopod as Nikon does not have IS in-body like compacts (and do I hear, Sony, from eccles?!)Rosy Rustic wrote:Even my best are always sh*t.
I got far better pictures with the compact, I just can't get the hang of the DSLR. I guess I am just photograpically challenged.
They like it because it is good, it is pretty and pleasing.all sorts of people like it so why nil points
Antonym,To Rog the Pedant.
If you are going to comment upon my grammar and punctuation, you should make sure you check your own![]()
![]()